2013-14 in Perspective: Part 1 (“Polarization”?)
2013-14 in Perspective: Part 2 (4-3 Majorities)
A 4-3 Surge
A Liberal High-Water Mark?
A New Minister of Dissents?
A Spike in Fractured Decisions
Abrahamson/Bablitch, Roggensack/Kelly: A Parallel?
Adding Michigan and Illinois–2023-24
Bloc Cohesion in 2020-21
Comparing the Supreme Courts of Wisconsin and its Four Neighbors
Comparing the Supreme Courts of Wisconsin and its Four Neighbors–An Update for 2016-17 through 2018-19
Comparing the Supreme Courts of Wisconsin and its Neighbors–2023-24
Comparing the Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Iowa Supreme Courts—Part 2
Insurance Cases, 2008-09 through 2013-14
Jill Karofsky and “Bloc Cohesion” at the Wisconsin Supreme Court
Strange Bedfellows in 4-3 Decisions at the Wisconsin Supreme Court
The 2023-24 Term: Some More Impressions
The Butler-Gableman Divide: Wisconsin Supreme Court Elections Matter
The Supreme Court’s 2014-15 Term: Some Initial Observations
The Supreme Court’s 2015-16 Term: Some Initial Impressions
The Supreme Court’s 2016-17 Term: Some Initial Impressions
The Supreme Court’s 2017-18 Term: Some Initial Impressions
The Supreme Court’s 2018-19 Term: Some Initial Impressions
The Supreme Court’s 2019-20 Term: Some Initial Impressions
The Supreme Court’s 2020-21 Term: Some Initial Impressions
The Supreme Court’s 2021-22 Term: Some Initial Impressions
The Supreme Court’s 2022-23 Term: Some Initial Impressions
The Voting Records of Justices Crooks and Prosser and Justices Rebecca Bradley and Kelly: Some Comparisons
United States v. Wisconsin—Polarization of the Courts
When Allies Disagree
Who Writes the Most Important Decisions?
Wisconsin v. Minnesota—Comparing Supreme Courts, Part 2
“You’ve gotta win Hagedorn”