Wisconsin Supreme Court Statistics, 1917-18

These tables are derived from information contained in 194 Wisconsin Supreme Court decisions that were turned up in a Nexis Uni search for decisions filed between September 1, 1917, and August 31, 1918.  The total of 194 decisions does not include various orders pertaining to petitions, motions, and disciplinary matters involving lawyers and judges.

Cases are omitted if they were decided during the previous term but appeared in the search results because motions for reconsideration were not decided until 1917-18.  Such cases will be included in the tables for 1916-17. 

Also omitted are two deadlocked (3-3) cases: ESTATE OF CARTER: STATE v. CARTER and Rathenberger v. Jacob.

When two (or more) cases were in effect consolidated—one was simply said to be ruled by the decision in the other—the cases are counted as only one.  For instance: Simon v. de Gersdorff (166 Wis. 170) and Simon v. de Gersdorff (166 Wis. 177).

Eight justices appear in the tables because Walter Owen defeated incumbent Justice Roujet Marshall in April 1917.  Justice Marshall remained on the court until January 7, 1918, when Justice Owen replaced him.  It is generally possible to determine if Justice Marshall or Justice Owen participated in decisions filed shortly after January 7, and thus I included both men in the tables.  However, I occasionally had to guess from internal evidence whether one or the other of the two justices took part, and this should be borne in mind when viewing the statistics.

The tables are available as a complete set and by individual topic in the subsets listed below.

Four-to-Three Decisions
Decisions Arranged by Vote Split
Frequency of Justices in the Majority
Distribution of Opinion Authorship
Frequency of Agreement Between Pairs of Justices

Law Firm Fantasy League

This week’s decision in Heather Gudex v. Franklin Collection Service, Inc. delivered a point to the Waivers from an amicus brief by Husch Blackwell, thereby moving the Waivers up the standings into a second-place tie with the Affirmed.

Two dramatic cases from Bill Tyroler

Responding to last week’s post on “Judgments from our Past,” Bill Tyroler kindly highlighted a pair of cases that are bound to interest many readers.  His comments are quoted below. … [Continue reading]

Law Firm Fantasy League

Both decisions filed this week delivered fantasy league points and shook up the standings in the process.  The Affirmed picked up a point for an amicus brief by Meissner Tierney Fisher & Nichols in State v. Andreas W. Rauch Sharak, and the … [Continue reading]

Judgments from our Past—1917-18 through 1921-22

Last year we began a series of posts on intriguing and sometimes exotic century-old cases.  Whether the facts now feel antiquated, the disputes distant, or the reasoning curious—something in these cases summons an earlier age.  Along with matters of … [Continue reading]

Law Firm Fantasy League

No decisions were filed this week--hence, no change in the standings. … [Continue reading]

Law Firm Fantasy League

No decisions were filed this week--hence, no change in the standings. … [Continue reading]

Law Firm Fantasy League

No decisions were filed this week--hence, no change in the standings. … [Continue reading]

Three Realignments: Voting Coalitions from 2016 to 2025

During the past decade, the Wisconsin Supreme Court traversed three distinct eras created by changes in the court’s composition.  The following tables and charts track these shifts and demonstrate how significantly they altered the influence of … [Continue reading]

Law Firm Fantasy League

No decisions were filed this week--hence, no change in the standings. … [Continue reading]