Law Firm Fantasy League

This week’s decisions removed any doubt as to the preeminent team during the first half of the season.  The league-leading Writs—especially Cannon & Dunphy and Habush, Habush & Rottier—towered over the rest of the field, as detailed below.  Among the other teams, the Gavels from the State Public Defender’s Office made the most noise and strengthened their hold on second place.

Click here for the complete standings.

The Writs: 22 points.
11 points from Cannon & Dunphy for a brief, oral argument, and favorable outcome in ACUITY v. Estate of Michael Shimeta and one point for an amicus brief in Beatriz Banuelos v. University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority.
10 points from Habush, Habush & Rottier for a brief, oral argument, and favorable outcome in Banuelos.
1 point from Godfrey & Kahn for an amicus brief in ACUITY.

The Gavels of the State Public Defender’s Office: 5 points.
5 points for a brief and oral argument in State v. Jovan T. Mull

The Waivers: 2 points.
1 point from Quarles & Brady for an amicus brief in Banuelos.
1 point from von Briesen & Roper for an amicus brief in Banuelos.

About Alan Ball

Alan Ball is a Professor of History at Marquette University in Milwaukee, WI.

alan.ball@marquette.edu

SCOWstats offers numerical analysis of the voting by Wisconsin Supreme Court justices on diverse issues over the past 90 years.

Speak Your Mind

*