Topics and Comment

2013-14 IN PERSPECTIVE: PART 1 (“Polarization”?)
2013-14 IN PERSPECTIVE: PART 2 (4-3 Majorities)
2013-14 IN PERSPECTIVE: PART 3 (Reversals in Criminal Cases)
CONCURRENCES, DISSENTS, AND EFFICIENCY
FATE OF SIXTH-AMENDMENT ARGUMENTS
HOW EFFECTIVE ARE FOURTH-AMENDMENT ARGUMENTS IN THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT?
HOW FREQUENTLY DO JUSTICES JOIN CONCURRENCES AND DISSENTS WRITTEN BY THEIR COLLEAGUES?
INSURANCE CASES, 2008/9 through 2013/14
IS THE COURT OF APPEALS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SUPREME COURT’S PER CURIAM DIET?
JUSTICE ABRAHAMSON’S CONCERNS OVER THE 2015-16 DOCKET
JUSTICE ABRAHAMSON’S CONCERNS OVER THE DOCKET–AN UPDATE
JUSTICE CROOKS, A SWING VOTE?
LAW FIRM SUCCESS RATES
LAW SCHOOL REPRESENTATION RATES; ORAL ARGUMENTS, 2008-9 through 2013-14
MEDICAL-MALPRACTICE CASES, 1995-96 through 2014-15
PACE OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
PUBLIC DEFENDER OUTCOMES COMPARED TO THE “FIELD,” 2008-09 through 2013-14
RACE OF DEFENDANTS IN OWI, DRUG, AND SEX CASES
REVERSALS IN CRIMINAL CASES
STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER CASES, 2009/10-2012/13
STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER OUTCOMES, 1995-96 through 2013-14
SUCCESS RATES FOR LITIGANTS FILING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
SWELLING SUPREME COURT DECISIONS, 1995-96 through 2013-14
SWELLING SUPREME COURT DECISIONS: AN UPDATE FOR 2014-15
THE FATE OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW IN CRIMINAL CASES, 2014-15
THE PUBLIC RECORDS LAW AND THE JUSTICES
THE SUPREME COURT’S 2014-15 TERM: SOME INITIAL OBSERVATIONS
WAITING FOR DECISIONS
WISCONSIN v. MINNESOTA–COMPARING THE SUPREME COURTS, PART 1
WOMEN AND THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT