Law Firm Fantasy League

As detailed below, this week’s decisions showered points on three of the league’s teams, moving all of them well above the fourth-place Gavels.  Click here for the updated standings.

The Writs: 15 points.
Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, 10 points for a brief, oral argument, and favorable outcome in Billie Johnson v. Wisconsin Elections Commission.

Pines Bach, five points for a brief and oral argument in Billie Johnson v. Wisconsin Elections Commission.

The Waivers: 13 points.
Troutman Pepper, 10 points for a brief, oral argument, and favorable outcome in Billie Johnson v. Wisconsin Elections Commission.

Boardman & Clark, three points for a brief in Billie Johnson v. Wisconsin Elections Commission.

The Affirmed: 11 points.
Stafford Rosenbaum, five points for a brief and oral argument in Billie Johnson v. Wisconsin Elections Commission and one point for an amicus brief in James Sewell v. Racine Unified School District Board of Canvassers.

O’Neil, Cannon, Hollman, DeJong & Laing, five points for a brief and oral argument in Nudo Holdings, LLC v. Board of Review for the City of Kenosha.

 

About Alan Ball

Alan Ball is a Professor of History at Marquette University in Milwaukee, WI.

alan.ball@marquette.edu

SCOWstats offers numerical analysis of the voting by Wisconsin Supreme Court justices on diverse issues over the past 75 years.

Speak Your Mind

*