Several years ago, a pair of posts examined two important trends in the Wisconsin Court of Appeals: (1) the sharp decline in the total number of decisions issued, and (2) the decreasing percentage of those decisions that were published. Both trends … [Continue reading]
This week’s decision in Josh Kaul v. Wisconsin State Legislature bestowed five points on the Waivers for a brief and oral argument by Troutman Pepper Locke—bringing them back into a tie with the Gavels in their see-saw battle for third … [Continue reading]
This week’s decision in State v. Kordell L. Grady provided five points to the Gavels of the State Public Defender’s Office for a brief and oral argument, moving them into sole possession of third place. Click here for the current standings. … [Continue reading]
These tables are derived from information contained in 295 Wisconsin Supreme Court decisions that were turned up in a Nexis Uni search for decisions filed between September 1, 1922, and August 31, 1923. The total of 295 decisions does not include … [Continue reading]
With this week’s decision in State v. H. C., the Gavels of the State Public Defender’s Office picked up five points for a brief and oral argument, joining the Waivers in third place. Click here for the current standings. … [Continue reading]
No decisions were filed this week--hence, no change in the standings. … [Continue reading]
It’s time again for the biannual survey of attorneys who deliver frequent oral arguments at the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Our tables differ considerably from those of earlier posts,[1] reflecting the dramatic change in the court’s output. … [Continue reading]
This week's decision in Melissa A. Hubbard v. Carol J. Neuman, MD did not bring any points to fantasy league teams--hence, no change in the standings. … [Continue reading]
No decisions were filed this week--hence, no change in the standings. … [Continue reading]
No decisions were filed this week--hence, no change in the standings. … [Continue reading]
alan.ball@marquette.edu
SCOWstats offers numerical analysis of the voting by Wisconsin Supreme Court justices on diverse issues over the past 104 years.
